|
Fifty years ago today, Wilt Chamberlain set one of the most impressive records in sports by scoring 100 points in a Philadelphia Warriors win over the New York Knicks. In the half-century since then, only Kobe Bryant has come within 25 points of matching Chamberlain's round number. The 100-point game was the highlight of a season during which Chamberlain set a record by scoring points per game.
The NBA of 1962 was very different than the league we know today, both on and off the court. Not coincidentally, 1961-62 also marked the high-water mark for NBA scoring at 118.8 points per game. Because steals, blocks and turnovers were not yet tracked (and would not be for a decade and a half more), we don't have a complete picture. What we can tell from field goal attempts and free throw attempts shows a fast-paced, inefficient game that most closely resembles the Paul Westhead Nuggets of anything from the last quarter-century.
In 1961-62, the average team took 107.7 shots and 37.1 free throws per game. That's 124.0 shooting plays per game. Chamberlain's Warriors played even faster, averaging 129.3. Since the ABA-NBA merger, only Westhead's 1990-91 team has averaged more than 113.4 shooting plays per game, at 120.3. (The top seven post-merger spots all belong to Denver squads, most of them coached by Doug Moe.) So the high scoring averages seen in 1961-62 were much more about volume than efficiency. The average True Shooting Percentage in 1961-62 was .479; the worst of the last three decades was .511, in the 1998-99 lockout-shortened season. (This year it's .522.) Though we don't have exact turnover numbers, the history of turnover rates declining sharply as soon as the stat was tracked at the individual level suggests many more plays ended in turnovers a half-century ago than now.
Accounting for pace takes much of the air out of Chamberlain's numbers from 1961-62. Converting his points per game to an environment with more than a quarter fewer plays takes his scoring average from 50.4 to 35.9--still higher than any achieved since the merger, but barely better than the 35.4 points per game Bryant averaged in 2005-06. If we move the opposite direction, here's how this year's leaderboard would look, converted to Chamberlain's 1961-62 pace:
Player Tm PPG
--------------------------------
Kobe Bryant LAL 41.2
Kevin Durant OKC 39.9
LeBron James MIA 39.1
Andrea Bargnani TOR 34.7
Kevin Love MIN 34.2
Russell Westbrook OKC 33.7
Deron Williams NJN 32.0
Dwyane Wade MIA 32.0
Derrick Rose CHI 31.6
Monta Ellis GSW 31.5
Wouldn't the three-way scoring race between Kobe Bryant, Kevin Durant and LeBron James be a whole lot more fun if all three players were pushing 40 points a night? Converting to 1961-62 pace also indicates that no fewer than 69 players would average at least 20 points per game, including such luminaries as Gerald Henderson and Jarrett Jack.
But wait, there's more! The most remarkable aspect of Chamberlain's 1961-62, to me, is the 48.5 minutes he averaged. Chamberlain missed just eight possible minutes all season. Seen one way, it's a testament to his superhuman ability that Chamberlain could play so effectively with so little rest. (He also had to avoid foul trouble, one of his legendary strengths throughout his career.) At the same time, Chamberlain's prodigious minute totals certainly made it a lot easier for him to pile up points. If we push everyone's average to 48.5 minutes per game, suddenly the modern league features a handful of Wilts.
Player Tm PPG
--------------------------------
Kobe Bryant LAL 52.5
LeBron James MIA 51.6
Kevin Durant OKC 50.9
Dwyane Wade MIA 48.0
Andrea Bargnani TOR 46.6
Russell Westbrook OKC 46.5
Derrick Rose CHI 43.3
Carmelo Anthony NYK 43.0
Kevin Love MIN 41.9
Deron Williams NJN 41.7
I don't know about anyone else, but I love the concept of a league where James and Dwyane Wade average a combined 99.6 points per game. However, we're no longer being fair to The Dipper. Part of the reason current players like better from this perspective is they enjoy the benefit of greater efficiency for a variety of reasons, including the three-point shot (a weapon for each of the top 10 scorers) and the same slower pace for which we've previously accounted. So what if we improve Wilt's efficiency by the difference between the two leagues? Suddenly Chamberlain's improved average of 55.0 points per game is tops again, albeit by a narrow margin.
Applying the same adjustments to Chamberlain's 100 point night shows the modern equivalent is about 77 points. So maybe Bryant's 81-point effort on January 22, 2006 was in fact no less impressive, but no one else has reached such heights. Even if Chamberlain's feat was aided by the league context in which he played, it still stands the test of time.
Kevin Pelton is an author of Basketball Prospectus.
You can contact Kevin by clicking here or click here to see Kevin's other articles.
|
You left out Jordan's 37.1 PPG during the 1986-1987 which is the highest scoring average since the merger as well as the highest non-Wilt scoring average. What does that convert to in comparison to this season and Wilt's 61-62 season?